Pregame GOOG Earnings from Every Angle 1.22.2013

[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="24556347"]

Last quarter GOOG’s earnings were leaked. This lead to unsure and volatile action, price’s reaction to this news was net bearish. Investors are hoping this doesn’t happen again. Of the last nine observations, excluding last quarter timing error, post EPS activity is mixed. In most of the sample set, six of the nine observations, GOOG gapped and pinned on expiration at a large round number. In the other observations, GOOG gapped, but then filled or reversed into said gap.

GOOG was around the $750 level before last quarter’s report. This report proved to be the catalyst for further downside action. After the report, GOOG shares came down to test the 200-day moving average. On this day specifically, shares formed a bottoming tail hammer and the following day printed a nice confirmation bar…shares have been in rally mode since.

The ATM (at the money) weekly $705 straddle (lifting the offer) is at about $42.00 (5.9% of stock). It is easy to calculate break evens on the straddle. At last check the stock was around $705; $747.00 & $663.00 are the respective upper and lower breakeven. Straddle traders need to be aware of fast weekly time decay and the IV crush post earnings. Implied volatility (IV) is a measure of risk, supply and demand, relative price, and an input into theoretical models for options.

salerno.mark.a@gmail.com

GOOG Earnings History and Pin Action in Oct 10.8.2012

[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="24556347"]

While past performance does not guarantee future results, since Google’s IPO in 2004 this pattern has proven itself every quarter. The first chart below displays the gaps (white circles) and expiration dates (red dotted line). While on some dates the two didn’t line up perfectly (the expiration cycle and earnings), the gap and pin still proved significant. The sheer fact that a massive stock like GOOG has had this pattern 100% of the time so far should give even skeptical invertors and traders pause. Many may not believe in these patterns, but it is important to respect them for many traders with lots of capital do watch these. Even if it is the ‘tail wagging the dog’ these patterns should manifest at least a little attention.

The excel sheet is perhaps the most interesting data point. Read all of it. However should one have a short attention span and quick trigger finger, the average gap up was 8% (**having gapped up every time) and the average distance from the nearest strike was $1.45, not much considering GOOG averaged $470 a share during each October. Considering the massive premium in Google options $1.45 is not much (0.3% of average price). So selling premium, post the gap, could be a way to play this pattern should one be inclined to do so…iron condors for example.

Volume and open interest are also important to look at. The third graphic displays said variables on expiration Friday post earnings. Here after the catalyst, hedgers and speculators square up their positions, for they do not know if they will be assigned, expire ITM, or OTM…hence pinning the stock as they make these adjustments. The strongest years were 2009, 2006, and 2005; where the difference from closing price and strike was the smallest.  Thousands of contracts changed hands on these dates; forcing this phenomenon…this is the third chart below.

GOOG has been on a tear lately, this recent rally looks eerily similar to the late 2007 period where the stock raged to a new all time high for nearly 35 days in a row, with a day or two breather along the way, but still similar. See chart four. Maybe suspicious traders will position short ahead of the catalyst, and as they cover post the assumed gap up, they will be the last marginal buyer…as the stock then pulls back. In related news Eric Schmidt sold $130 million in shares between September 24th and 26th and filed to sell $1.45 billion worth of shares in February.

chart1

chart2

chart3

chart4

E-mail the author with any comments, questions, or inquiry:

mark@keeneonthemarket.com

Data courtesy of Thinkorswim